In half of these cases, the fictitious defendant had a typically Spanish name. How did the three groups of students (in a bad, sad, and neutral mood) rate their Spanish (and ethnically neutral) peers? As you might guess, bad students were more likely to see guilt in their peers with Spanish names. However, they did not interpret the behavior of the defendants with neutral names in this way. However, such relationships were not found in students with sad and neutral moods.
According to Bodenhaus, these results are proof of the existence of a mechanism called "heuristic information processing." When you get angry, instead of using the rational part of your brain, you follow the voice of intuition (which in the case of students was associated with stereotypes). In other words, in the cited study, anger among students caused them to "lose their heads."
Bodenhausen then conducted a very similar experiment, this time by persuasion. He caused anger and sadness again, while the third group remained in a neutral mood. He then ordered them to read an essay about raising the age limit from which one can obtain a driver's license in the United States (from 16 to 18 years old). Half of the students were told that the essay was written by "a group of transportation experts from Princeton University." The other half received information that the authors of the text were "a group of students from a small college in New Jersey." How convincing were the students' arguments in this essay? The results showed that students in a sad mood were guided by reason and formulated their opinions mainly based on logical arguments that were written at work. For students in a bad mood, the source from which the arguments came (and therefore the author of the essay) was more important than their content.
In other words: when you get angry, the person representing the position is important in the argument, not in the situation, that is, in essential matters. Anger weakens the ability to think logically and make rational decisions. This happens in a very interesting way: a bad mood opens the way for your biases, biases, and instincts-for all the beliefs and values that are just an emergency plan. They are usually overcome by the more polite, logical, and conscious part of your mind.
This way, you can argue when you're sad and still be a rational and logical person. Nevertheless, arguing in anger activates inappropriate and intuitive beliefs. As a result, spoken words and decisions often do not serve your interests and needs. MILFS, Matures, Teens. Best Porn Online https://mat6tube.com/ watch right now! USA, UK, Australia, South Korea, France, Germany, etc.
According to Bodenhaus, these results are proof of the existence of a mechanism called "heuristic information processing." When you get angry, instead of using the rational part of your brain, you follow the voice of intuition (which in the case of students was associated with stereotypes). In other words, in the cited study, anger among students caused them to "lose their heads."
Bodenhausen then conducted a very similar experiment, this time by persuasion. He caused anger and sadness again, while the third group remained in a neutral mood. He then ordered them to read an essay about raising the age limit from which one can obtain a driver's license in the United States (from 16 to 18 years old). Half of the students were told that the essay was written by "a group of transportation experts from Princeton University." The other half received information that the authors of the text were "a group of students from a small college in New Jersey." How convincing were the students' arguments in this essay? The results showed that students in a sad mood were guided by reason and formulated their opinions mainly based on logical arguments that were written at work. For students in a bad mood, the source from which the arguments came (and therefore the author of the essay) was more important than their content.
In other words: when you get angry, the person representing the position is important in the argument, not in the situation, that is, in essential matters. Anger weakens the ability to think logically and make rational decisions. This happens in a very interesting way: a bad mood opens the way for your biases, biases, and instincts-for all the beliefs and values that are just an emergency plan. They are usually overcome by the more polite, logical, and conscious part of your mind.
This way, you can argue when you're sad and still be a rational and logical person. Nevertheless, arguing in anger activates inappropriate and intuitive beliefs. As a result, spoken words and decisions often do not serve your interests and needs. MILFS, Matures, Teens. Best Porn Online https://mat6tube.com/ watch right now! USA, UK, Australia, South Korea, France, Germany, etc.
